Hayfield Northern Railroad v. Chicago & North Western Transportation Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Marshall
The Staggers Rail Act of 1980, which amended the Interstate Commerce Act, 1 regulates the process by which rail carriers may abandon unprofitable lines and provides a mechanism for shippers to obtain continued service by purchasing lines or subsidizing their operation. This case poses the question whether the Interstate Commerce Act, as amended, pre-empts a Minnesota eminent domain statute 2 used to condemn rail property after it has been abandoned pursuant to the amendments. The Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit held that the Act, as amended, pre-empted the state statute. 693 F. 2d 819…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hines v. DavidowitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Gibbons v. OgdenSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. State Energy Resources Conservation & Development CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United States v. Utah Construction & Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by133 opinions
- Preseault v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. Jack BobkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- B&B Hardware, Inc. v. Hargis Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Rural Water System 1 v. City of Sioux CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1997
- Lawson v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1986
128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.