Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Haight v. Catholic Healthcare West

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 21, 2010No. 07-16857PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER AND AMENDED OPINION

GRABER, Circuit Judge:

ORDER

The opinion filed on February 4, 2010, slip opinion page 2057, and appearing at 594 F.3d 694, is amended as follows:

On slip opinion page 2063, line 2, 594 F.3d at 697, of the last paragraph, change the comma to a period after “ ‘inequitable.’ on line 9, 594 F.3d at 697, after “harsh consequences.’ ” insert:

Notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s guidance, Plaintiffs urge us to follow George v. Camacho, 119 F.3d 1393 (9th Cir.1997) (en banc), in which we refused to apply retroactively our decision to shorten the time period for filing a notice of…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Bowles v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Browder v. Director, Dept. of Corrections of Ill.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. RisjordSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Blajro v. CitizenshipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Nunez-Reyes v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  3. Derek Hoggett v. University of PhoenixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. Edward Colbert v. Theodore BrennanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2014
  5. Washington v. RyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API