Legal Opinion
Blajro v. Citizenship
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 23, 2015No. Nos. 11-17948, 12-17765PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge TALLMAN; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge RAWLINSON.
ORDER
TALLMAN, Circuit Judge:
The panel has voted to amend its previous opinion and issues the following opinion to replace it. With this amendment, Judges Tallman and Murphy have voted to deny the Appellants’ petition for panel rehearing; Judge Rawlinson has voted to grant the Appellants’ petition for panel rehearing. The Appellants’ petition for panel rehearing is DENIED.
The panel has voted to deny the Appel-lees’ petition for panel rehearing; Judges Tallman and Rawlinson have voted to deny the petition for…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- State of Washington v. Donald J. TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Roderick Magadia v. Wal-Mart AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of Homeland SEC.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- Kimberly Gaetano v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
- Animal Legal Defense Fund v. U.S. Dep't of Agric.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.