Rosenblum v. Frankel
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtVan Voorhis, J.
The complaint has been dismissed against defendant Edward M. Frankel, on his motion, dne to the illegality of part of the business of the alleged joint venture of which plaintiffs seek an accounting. The joint adventurers are alleged to have been the three plaintiffs Eosenblum and the defendants Frankel and Greene. The subject matter of the venture, as stated in the complaint, consisted of two Virgin Islands corporations and a business known as Stuart Lloyd Co. of which the plaintiff Charles Eosenblum was originally the sole proprietor. The answer pleads by way of defense that prior to the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Carmine v. MurphyNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
- Zwirn v. GalentoNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Sturm v. TrubyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
- O'Connor v. O'ConnorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
- During v. ValenteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Hostetter v. Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Rutkin v. ReinfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Janke v. JankeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Rutkin v. ReinfeldCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Idlewild Bon Voyage Liquor Corp. v. EpsteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.