Legal Opinion

Flintoff v. Muskegon Traction & Lighting Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1919No. Docket No. 71PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Muskegon; Sullivan (James E.), J. Case by George A. Flintoff, administrator of the estate of George N. Flintoff, deceased, against the Muskegon Traction & Lighting Company for the alleged negligent killing of plaintiff’s decedent. Judgment for defendant. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtStone, J.

This action was brought under the “death act,” so-called, to recover damages from the defendant for causing the instant death of George N. Flintoff, the son of the plaintiff, a boy 7 years and 5 months old, at about noon on December 31, 1916, at the city of Muskegon. The first count of the declaration alleged the negligence of the defendant to consist of failure to ring a bell or sound a gong, to warn, when approaching the plaintiff’s decedent where he was on the track; that defendant was guilty of gross negli-. gence in not stopping the car to avoid the accident; and that defendant was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fike v. Pere Marquette RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Love v. Detroit, Jackson & Chicago RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Trudell v. Grand Trunk Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Stoll v. LaubengayerMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Mollica v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1912

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Besonen v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Church v. StoldtMichigan Supreme Court · 1921
  3. McCann v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API