Legal Opinion

United States v. Robert Diltz

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 25, 1980No. 79-1058PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAM E. DOYLE, Circuit Judge.

The question in this case is whether the trial court committed error in its denial of the motion of the defendant-appellant Robert Diltz, which motion sought to suppress evidence obtained from an authorized wiretap and order that did not identify the defendant Diltz as one of the persons to be intercepted. It is the defendant’s contention that in truth he was a target. The government’s position is that its omission to name defendant Diltz in its application for an order authorizing a wiretap of a codefendant, Charles D. Bremson, Jr., was attributable to the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Carroll v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  4. Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  5. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Corky NunezCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. Oscar Armendariz, United States of America v. Gabriel AguirreCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States v. MoskoDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1987
  4. United States v. LyonsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1981
  5. United States v. BennettDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API