Legal Opinion

Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of Berkeley

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 23, 2015No. A131254PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

STREETER, J.

-Real parties in interest and respondents Mitchell Kapor and Freada Kapor-Klein secured permits from respondent City of Berkeley (City) to build a large home on a large lot in the Berkeley hills, and appellants Berkeley Hillside Preservation and Susan Nunes Fadley challenged the project under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, Pub. Resources Code, § 21000 et seq.).1 The first time we considered this challenge, we concluded, contrary to the City’s determination, that the project presented unusual circumstances, thus triggering an exception to CEQA’s categorical…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  2. Ass'n for Protection of Environmental Values v. City of UkiahCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  3. Fairbank v. City of Mill ValleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  4. Salmon Protection & Watershed Network v. County of MarinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  5. Lotus v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Berkeley Hills Watershed Coal. v. City of Berkeley, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  2. Berkeley Hills Watershed Coalition v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API