Legal Opinion
Lotus v. Department of Transportation
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 30, 2014No. A137315PublishedCited by 18 opinions
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
POLLAK, J.
Appellants 1 appeal from a judgment denying their petition for a writ of mandate and injunctive relief challenging the sufficiency of an environmental impact report (EIR) approved by the State of California’s Department of Transportation (Caltrans). The project involved is highway construction to adjust the alignment of the approximately one-mile stretch of United States Route 101 that passes through Richardson Grove State Park (park). While we reject many of appellants’ challges to the adequacy of the EIR, we agree that the report is insufficient insofar as it fails to…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State Water Resources Control Board CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Sacramento Old City Ass'n v. City Council of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- North Coast Rivers Alliance v. Marin Municipal Water District Board of DirectorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
- Village Laguna of Laguna Beach, Inc. v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- Lincoln Place Tenants Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cleveland Nat'l Forest Found. v. San Diego Ass'n of GovernmentsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- Cleveland Nat'l Forest Found. v. San Diego Ass'n of Governments, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Bess Bair v. Cal. Dept of Transp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Aqualliance v. U.S. Bureau of ReclamationDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Berkeley Hillside Preservation v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.