Legal Opinion
Salmon Protection & Watershed Network v. County of Marin
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 18, 2005No. A105592PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SEPULVEDA, J.
The County of Marin (the County) approved appellant Joshua Hedlund’s construction of a house within a riparian area designated by the County as an environmental resource of critical concern. In approving the project, the County concluded that the project was categorically exempt from review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (Pub. Resources Code, § 21050 et seq.) because it entailed construction of a single-family residence. (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 15303, subd. (a).) The County did not make express findings on the specific regulatory exception…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Mountain Lion Foundation v. Fish & Game CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Azusa Land Reclamation Co. v. Main San Gabriel Basin WatermasterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Fairbank v. City of Mill ValleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
3Cited by22 opinions
- McAllister v. County of MontereyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- California Farm Bureau Federation v. California Wildlife Conservation BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Don't Cell Our Parks v. City of San Diego, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Wollmer v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Berkeley Hills Watershed Coal. v. City of Berkeley, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.