Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Southern Guar. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 28, 1986No. 84-1149PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal by Harry Mitchell, plaintiff, from a summary judgment in favor of Southern Guaranty Insurance Company (Southern Guaranty) and others, defendants, in plaintiff's action based upon fraud. We reverse and remand.

Plaintiff Mitchell had obtained an insurance policy containing collision coverage from Southern Guaranty on a 1983 Chevrolet pickup truck. On August 22, 1984, this truck was involved in a collision with another vehicle. We quote from Mitchell's deposition concerning his subsequent contact with Southern Guaranty's agent, Randy McDonald:

"Q. What, if anything, did you do with respect…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. International Resorts, Inc. v. LambertSupreme Court of Alabama · 1977
  2. Earnest v. Pritchett-Moore, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  3. Mitchell v. StateCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  4. Wilger v. JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. John E. Collier v. Ron E. Jones and the Attorney General of the State of AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
  2. Cobb v. SOUTHEAST TOYOTA DISTRIBUTORSSupreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  3. Bird v. Auto Owners Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990
  4. Cleveland v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1990
  5. House v. HendersonCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API