Legal Opinion

Dube v. Rochette

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided February 27, 1970No. 5864PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Action to recover damages by a husband for the alienation of his wife’s affections by the defendant. At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence in a trial by jury the Court (Botones, J.) granted the defendant’s motion for a nonsuit and reserved and transferred the plaintiff’s exception thereto.

This state enacted in 1941 a so-called heart balm statute (see Vol. 1 Shepard’s N. H. Citations, p. 429 (1959)) which abolished actions for breach of contract to marry. Laws 1941, ch. 150; RSA 508:11. The statute by its terms has a limited application ( Gikas v. Nicholis, 96 N. H. 177, 71 A. 2d 785 ) and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Woodhouse v. Woodhouse Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1925
  2. Kiger v. MeehanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
  3. Caplan v. CaplanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
  4. Gikas v. NicholisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1950
  5. Lavigne v. LavigneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Nelson v. JacobsenUtah Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Fundermann v. MickelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  3. Feldman v. FeldmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
  4. Cannon v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  5. Duval v. WigginSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API