Dube v. Rochette
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
1Per curiam
Action to recover damages by a husband for the alienation of his wife’s affections by the defendant. At the close of the plaintiff’s evidence in a trial by jury the Court (Botones, J.) granted the defendant’s motion for a nonsuit and reserved and transferred the plaintiff’s exception thereto.
This state enacted in 1941 a so-called heart balm statute (see Vol. 1 Shepard’s N. H. Citations, p. 429 (1959)) which abolished actions for breach of contract to marry. Laws 1941, ch. 150; RSA 508:11. The statute by its terms has a limited application ( Gikas v. Nicholis, 96 N. H. 177, 71 A. 2d 785 ) and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Woodhouse v. Woodhouse Et Ux.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1925
- Kiger v. MeehanSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
- Caplan v. CaplanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1928
- Gikas v. NicholisSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1950
- Lavigne v. LavigneSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nelson v. JacobsenUtah Supreme Court · 1983
- Fundermann v. MickelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- Feldman v. FeldmanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
- Cannon v. MillerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
- Duval v. WigginSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1984
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.