Legal Opinion
CITY OF TULSA v. MAYES
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided December 8, 2016No. Case Number: 113486PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN F. FISCHER, JUDGE:
¶ 1 Employer City of Tulsa seeks review of an order of a three-judge panel of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Existing Claims. The panel affirmed the trial court’s denial of Employer’s “voluntary separation” defense and the award of temporary total disability (TTD) benefits to Claimant Rod Mayes. The panel’s order is neither contrary to law nor against the clear weight of the evidence and is sustained.
BACKGROUND
¶ 2 Most of the underlying facts in this case are undisputed. Claimant was a twenty-three-year employee of the City. Beginning in June 2007, he became a…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Williams Companies v. DunkelgodSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- Red Rock Mental Health v. RobertsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Barnhill v. Multiple Injury Trust FundSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2001
- Enochs v. Martin Properties, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1997
- Patterson v. Sue Estell Trucking Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2004
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- BROWN v. INFRASTRUCTURE & ENERGY ALTERNATIVESCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2020
- OAKES v. CITY OF STILLWATER and THE WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSIONCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2024