Legal Opinion
State v. Tirado
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 31, 1984No. 12203PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSpeziale, C. J.
The defendant, Emisael Tirado, was convicted by a jury of the crimes of robbery in the first degree, General Statutes § 53a-134 (a) (3), and assault in the first degree, General Statutes § 53a-59 (a) (1). He has appealed from the judgment claiming that: (1) he was denied effective assistance of counsel by defense counsel’s failure to subpoena certain out-of-state alibi witnesses pursuant to General Statutes § 54-82i (c); and (2) the trial court erred in refusing to poll the jury after one juror stated he felt “uncomfortable” in deciding the case. We find no error.
The facts relating to these…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- State v. BrownSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
- State v. MasonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- State v. HoytSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1880
- DiPalma v. WiesenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- State v. HinckleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- State v. ColtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- State v. TaltonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Aillon v. MeachumSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.