Legal Opinion
Lulac East Park Place Trust v. U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development
District Court, W.D. Texas
Decided December 16, 1998No. 5:98-cv-00814PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MATHY, United States Magistrate Judge.
Factual Background
On September 10, 1998 plaintiff filed its complaint and request for issuance of a temporary injunction (docket no. 1). On November 6, 1998 plaintiff filed its first amended complaint (docket no. 25) alleging that: HUD breached its contract with plaintiff in violation of the Tucker Act; HUD procedures in deciding to foreclose violated due process; and HUD’s decision to foreclose was arbitrary and capricious and an abuse of discretion in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). 1 On December 3, 1998 a hearing was held on…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Bowen v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Megapulse, Inc. v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
- Transohio Savings Bank v. Director, Office of Thrift SupervisionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1993
- Richardson v. MorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Katz v. CisnerosCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kennedy Heights Apartments, Ltd. I v. McMillanDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1999