Legal Opinion
Flores v. Arizona
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided October 12, 2000No. CIV. 92-596 TUC ACMPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
MARQUEZ, Senior District Judge.
Background: Motion for Post-judgment Relief
On January 24, 2000, this Court issued a declaratory judgment against the Defendants for failing to provide limited English proficient (LEP) children with a program of instruction calculated to make them proficient in speaking, understanding, reading, and writing English, while enabling them to master the standard academic curriculum as required of all students. See Lau v. Nichols, 414 U.S. 563, 94 S.Ct. 786, 39 L.Ed.2d 1 (1974) (failure to provide English instruction to students of Chinese descent who do not speak…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Whitcomb v. ChavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lau v. NicholsSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Missouri v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Roosevelt Elementary School District Number 66 v. BishopArizona Supreme Court · 1994
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Horne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Flores Ex Rel. Flores v. ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Horne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Flores v. HorneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Horne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 2009