Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Whitfield v. Tennessee

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 25, 2011No. 09-6488Published

1ConcurrenceJane B. Stranch, Circuit Judge

I concur with the lead opinion in this case. However, I write separately to urge the en banc court to avail itself of the next opportunity to reexamine our decisions imposing a “sole reason” standard on the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”).

Following enactment of the ADA in 1990, courts grappled with how to articulate the standards applicable to ADA litigation. Lacking precedent and finding a number of eases alleging claims under the ADA and the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“RA”), courts turned to the RA for guidance in interpreting the ADA. Such was the case in Maddox v. University of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Roger Monette and Doris Monette v. Electronic Data Systems CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  2. Joanne Hedrick v. Western Reserve Care System and Forum HealthCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
  3. Eric Jones v. John E. Potter, Postmaster GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
  4. Robert E. Maddox, III v. University of Tennessee University of Tennessee Board of Trustees Doug A. DickeyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995
  5. Fitzgerald v. Corrections Corp. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API