Legal Opinion

Selfridge v. Paxton

California Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1905No. S.F. No. 2995PublishedCited by 13 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

This is an action brought against the-defendants to recover for medical and surgical services rendered to Roma W. Paxton, the infant daughter of the said defendants. The case was tried without a jury, and the court made findings and rendered judgment for plaintiff. From the judgment and from an order denying a motion for a new trial the defendant Blitz W. Paxton appeals.

The facts material to the determination of the case are in brief these: For several years prior to the seventeenth day of September, 1894, defendants were married to each other, and during that time the said Roma W. Paxton was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McKay v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Lewis v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. In Re Marriage of O'ConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Pacific Gold Dredging Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  4. In Re CarboniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Blair v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API