Selfridge v. Paxton
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.
This is an action brought against the-defendants to recover for medical and surgical services rendered to Roma W. Paxton, the infant daughter of the said defendants. The case was tried without a jury, and the court made findings and rendered judgment for plaintiff. From the judgment and from an order denying a motion for a new trial the defendant Blitz W. Paxton appeals.
The facts material to the determination of the case are in brief these: For several years prior to the seventeenth day of September, 1894, defendants were married to each other, and during that time the said Roma W. Paxton was…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- McKay v. McKayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lewis v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- In Re Marriage of O'ConnellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Pacific Gold Dredging Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
- In Re CarboniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Blair v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.