Legal Opinion

Ault v. Council of City of San Rafael

California Supreme Court

Decided February 19, 1941No. S. F. 16544Published

1Opinion of the Court

17 Cal.2d 415 (1941)

JOHN M. AULT, Petitioner,

v.

THE COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF SAN RAFAEL et al., Respondents.

S. F. No. 16544.

Supreme Court of California. In Bank.

February 19, 1941.

Lionel Browne for Petitioner.

Martinelli & Gardiner for Respondents.

CURTIS, J.

Petitioner, as a registered elector of the City of San Rafael, filed his application for a writ of mandamus to compel respondents to publish a proposed amendment to the charter of said city, and to call a special election thereon not less than forty nor more than sixty days thereafter. An alternative writ of mandate has been heretofore issued;…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Conn v. City CouncilCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  2. Rogers v. Board of Directors of PasadenaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Ault v. Council of City of San RafaelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. DeBrincat v. MoganCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  5. Wallace v. PayneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API