Legal Opinion

Wilcox v. Pengelly

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 1, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWickhem, J.

Testatrix executed a will in January, 1930; a second will February 26, 1930, and a third will November 21, 1930. ' Objections to the will of November 21st were made upon the grounds that testatrix was mentally incompetent, and that the execution of the instrument was secured by undue influence. The trial court found against the contestants upon all these issues after a lengthy trial, during the course of which, the mental state of the testatrix during the entire period covered by the three wills was disclosed, as well as the circumstances Under which each will was executed. So far a.s the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Williams v. MalmWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Estate of KomarrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. DeThorne v. BakkenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1995
  3. In Re McIntyre EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. DeThorne v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
  5. DeThorne v. GibsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API