Legal Opinion · Dissent

DeThorne v. Gibson

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided May 16, 1991No. 90-0936Published

1DissentSundby, J.

Because I conclude that the circuit court incorrectly applied the law to the facts of this will execution case, I dissent.

The circuit court concluded that the assistance provided Robert DeThorne in executing his will vitiated his execution, under Estate of Komarr, 46 Wis. 2d 230, 236-38, 175 N.W.2d 473, 476-77 (1970), cert. denied, 401 U.S. 909 (1971). However, Komarr involved a testatrix who was physically unable to write her signature. The court stated the rule as follows:

We think that where one fails or is unable to in any manner expressly authorize another to sign for him, the statute's…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Estate of KomarrWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Wilcox v. PengellyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API