Estate of Komarr
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.
The following issues are raised on this appeal :(1) Was the purported will executed in conformity with sec. 238.06, Stats.;(2) Was the purported will procured by undue influence thereby necessitating the denial of its acceptance for probate;(3) Were the attorney-draftsman and his secretary incompetent, under sec. 885.16, Stats. (Dead Man’s Stat ute), to testify as to the execution of the purported will; and(4) Were certain of appellant’s exhibits improperly excluded from evidence by the trial court?
Execution in Conformity with Sec. 238.06, Stats.
The appellant contends that the execution of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Patterson v. JensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
- State v. HoranWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Schlichting v. SchlichtingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
- Curkeet v. EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
- Cooper v. ZoldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- William L. Burkhalter v. Steven P. BurkhalterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
- In Matter of Estate of DejmalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- In Matter of Estate of BeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Estate of Hamm v. JenkinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
- Bethesda Church v. MenningWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.