Legal Opinion

Estate of Komarr

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided April 3, 1970No. 96PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHanley, J.

The following issues are raised on this appeal :(1) Was the purported will executed in conformity with sec. 238.06, Stats.;(2) Was the purported will procured by undue influence thereby necessitating the denial of its acceptance for probate;(3) Were the attorney-draftsman and his secretary incompetent, under sec. 885.16, Stats. (Dead Man’s Stat ute), to testify as to the execution of the purported will; and(4) Were certain of appellant’s exhibits improperly excluded from evidence by the trial court?

Execution in Conformity with Sec. 238.06, Stats.

The appellant contends that the execution of…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Patterson v. JensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  2. State v. HoranWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Schlichting v. SchlichtingWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Curkeet v. EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Cooper v. ZoldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. William L. Burkhalter v. Steven P. BurkhalterSupreme Court of Iowa · 2013
  2. In Matter of Estate of DejmalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. In Matter of Estate of BeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Estate of Hamm v. JenkinsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Bethesda Church v. MenningWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API