State v. Hystad
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtPetrich, C.J.
Defendant appeals his convictions after pleading guilty to attempted first degree robbery, eluding a *44police officer, and second degree assault. He also appeals his habitual criminal sentencing. The issues involving the substantive offenses are whether defendant demonstrated that a withdrawal of his guilty plea was necessary to correct a manifest injustice and whether the State's notice of intent to file a habitual criminal allegation fettered defendant's right to testify in the trial of the substantive charges.
In the habitual criminal proceedings, the defendant challenged the court's…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Smith v. O'GRADYSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- State v. HolsworthWashington Supreme Court · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. ScrogginsIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- Indiana-Kentucky Electric Corp. v. GreenIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
- State v. HansenUtah Supreme Court · 1987
- State v. AmezolaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.