Legal Opinion

Utah Sand & Gravel Products Corp. v. Tolbert

Utah Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1965No. 10280PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice:

Defendant appeals from a denial of his motion to have a default judgment against him declared void for improper service of process.

On October 17, 1964, defendant was personally served with a summons which was titled, “In the City Court of Salt Lake City, Salt Lake County, State of Utah,” and indicating demand for judgment in the sum of $20,984.66. 1 A complaint was then •filed “In The Third District Court,” and a copy of the complaint was mailed to the ■defendant. Five days later, on October 22, 1964, plaintiff filed a motion and, without 'having served the same upon the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Taylor v. E. M. Royle Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Mayhew v. Standard Gilsonite CompanyUtah Supreme Court · 1962
  3. Thomas v. District Court of Third Judicial Dist. Ex Rel. Salt Lake CountyUtah Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Board of Education of the Granite School District v. CoxUtah Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Holton v. HoltonUtah Supreme Court · 1952

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Murdock v. BlakeUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Autoridad de las Fuentes Fluviales de Puerto Rico v. Tribunal SuperiorSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1970
  3. Griffiths v. HammonUtah Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Redwood Land Co. v. KimballUtah Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Carnes v. CarnesUtah Supreme Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API