Legal Opinion

Redwood Land Co. v. Kimball

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 22, 1967No. 10911PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Chief Justice:

Defendant, Mrs. Farrell W. Kimball, a resident of California, was granted an intermediate appeal to review an order denying her motion to quash service of summons in this action to quiet title to property in Utah.

Her argument that the motion should have been granted is grounded thus: the summons was served upon her personally in Sacramento County, California (in lieu of publication of summons, as allowed by Rule 4(f) (1) U.R.C.P.) on the 7th day of February, 1967. But proof of service was not made until eight days later, February 15, 1967, and thus not in compliance…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clinton v. MillerMontana Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Bourgeious v. Santa Fe Trail Stages, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Utah Sand & Gravel Products Corp. v. TolbertUtah Supreme Court · 1965
  4. Federal Land Bank of Berkeley v. BrintonUtah Supreme Court · 1944

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Grazer v. JonesUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  2. State in Interest of PittsUtah Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Jordan Credit Union v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2022
  4. CVB, Inc. v. USA DEBT RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, et al.District Court, D. Utah · 2026
  5. State in Interest of PittsUtah Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API