Legal Opinion

People v. Taylor

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 1989PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Kaye, J.

At the core of this appeal, in a prosecution for criminal possession of a controlled substance and related offenses, is the meaning of "substantial compliance” with the requirements of a statute — here, a statute specifically mandating that testimony taken in support of a search warrant application "be either recorded or summarized on the record by the court.” (CPL 690.40 [1].)

During the evening of January 16, 1987, the local police department called Webster Town Justice Jack Van Ingen to the station to conduct a hearing on an application for a warrant to search…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. People v. BartolomeoNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. People v. HanlonNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. United States v. Stanford Smith A/K/A Willie Ellis EveleighCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  2. People v. PattersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. People v. HarrisonNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. People v. DominiqueNew York Court of Appeals · 1997
  5. People v. SerranoNew York Court of Appeals · 1999

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API