Legal Opinion

People v. Dominique

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 2, 1997PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

On appeal, defendant contends that, even if the written search warrant application in this case was sufficient under CPL 690.35, it was rendered insufficient if the issuing court took oral testimony and failed to record that testimony as required by CPL 690.40 (1).

In the absence of any specific proof, the law presumes that the statutory requirements were satisfied. Under this "presumption of regularity” the law further presumes that no official or person acting under an oath of office will do anything…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1989

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. People v. KoniecznyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  2. People v. WoodardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  3. People v. AaronsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
  4. People v. TurcotteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  5. People v. EkiniciNew York Supreme Court · 2002

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API