People v. Dominique
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
On appeal, defendant contends that, even if the written search warrant application in this case was sufficient under CPL 690.35, it was rendered insufficient if the issuing court took oral testimony and failed to record that testimony as required by CPL 690.40 (1).
In the absence of any specific proof, the law presumes that the statutory requirements were satisfied. Under this "presumption of regularity” the law further presumes that no official or person acting under an oath of office will do anything…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. TaylorNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
3Cited by40 opinions
- People v. KoniecznyNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- People v. WoodardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. AaronsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- People v. TurcotteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. EkiniciNew York Supreme Court · 2002
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.