Legal Opinion

Aikens v. Aikens

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 15, 1914No. Appeal, No. 9PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal, No. 9, March T., 1914, by defendant, from order of C. P. Mifflin Co., Aug. T., 1911, No. 41, granting divorce in case of Howard W. Aikens v. Mollie A. Aikens. Exceptions to report of John T. Wilson, Esq., master. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was order granting divorce.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

The plaintiff averred in this libel that the respondent, “hath offered such indignities, and cruel and barbarous treatment to the person of the libelant as to render his condition intolerable and his life burdensome, and thereby compelled him to withdraw from his house and' home,” and prayed for a decree of divorce from the bonds of matrimony. While the allegation of the libel does not follow the language of the statute, the jurisdiction invoked is that conferred by the Act of June 25, 1895, P. L. 308. The respondent having filed an answer denying the allegations of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Richards v. RichardsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1860
  2. Schulze v. SchulzeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  3. Biddle v. BiddleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Sleight v. SleightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  2. Mathias v. MathiasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Dailey v. DaileySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Ford v. FordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  5. Hepworth v. HepworthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API