Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Dulaney v. Nygaard

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 28, 1921PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the circuit court for Eau Claire county; James Wickham, Circuit Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

This is a certiorari to review the proceedings of the county income tax board of review of Eau Claire county relative to plaintiff’s income. The plaintiff, a resident of Wisconsin, received during the income year in question dividends from a foreign corporation doing no business in Wisconsin, which dividends were declared in stock out of its earnings and profits accrued since January 1, 1911, but he did not include them in his income report. The taxing authorities included said stock dividends in the plaintiff’s taxable income and computed his income tax accordingly. *599This action was set aside…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fletcher v. PeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1810
  2. Eisner v. MacOmberSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. Ogden v. SaundersSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  4. Gibbons v. MahonSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
  5. Tax Commissioner v. PutnamMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Helvering v. GriffithsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. State ex rel. Van Dyke v. CaryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Wolf v. GerlachWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  4. McCreery v. McColganCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  5. Parker v. Commissioner of Corp. & TaxationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API