Legal Opinion
United States v. James Edward Walling
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 17, 1973No. 72-2834PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LUCAS, District Judge:
Walling was indicted along with Patricia Schell and Michael Smith for violation of the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2312. Walling and Smith pled guilty to the Dyer Act offense, Schell pled guilty to a less serious offense. Subsequently, Walling was granted the right to withdraw his guilty plea, and to change counsel. The Government reindicted him, including an additional count of conspiracy. In deference to counsel’s request for additional time to prepare for the new count, the district court was willing to continue the entire case, but Walling refused to waive his right to a…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Brinegar v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- United States v. Paul v. OatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Birdie Louise Joshua Harris, United States of America v. Billy Charles HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
- United States v. Louis J. Cella, Jr., Stephen R. Evans, Theodore Schiffman, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Maria Orozco, United States of America v. Jose Liva-CoronaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Glenn Noland RichardsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.