State of Indiana v. Brian J. Taylor
Indiana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
RUSH, Chief Justice.
A criminal suspect’s state and federal rights to counsel and confrontation of witnesses are essential to a fair trial. Here, police officers and a prosecutor eavesdropped on a criminal suspect’s pre-inter-rogation consultation with his lawyer, overhearing information regarding both evidence and trial strategy. Then, when called to testify about that eavesdropping in depositions and a suppression hearing, the officers’ invocation of their Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination left the suspect with no means of confirming what they heard. The parties agree — as…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Nix v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Lafler v. CooperSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Weatherford v. BurseySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State of Indiana v. John B. LarkinIndiana Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 2019
- Jacob Lee Silvers v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2018
- Anthony Wayne Barnett v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- In the Matter of: Robert NearyIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.