Legal Opinion

Bluestein v. Upjohn Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 17, 1981No. 80-2226PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Jiganti

The plaintiff, Stewart Bluestein, brought an action to recover damages for personal injuries which allegedly resulted from his ingestion of Cleocin, a drug manufactured by the Upjohn Company. The complaint alleged liability on the bases of negligence, strict liability, breach of warranty and wilful and wanton conduct. The trial court directed a verdict for Upjohn on the breach of warranty count. Although the jury returned a general verdict for the plaintiff, it answered “no” to a special interrogatory that asked “[w]as Cleocin a proximate cause of the injuries claimed by Stewart Bluestein?”…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Wicks v. Cuneo-Henneberry Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Banks v. United Insurance Co. of AmericaAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  3. Redmond v. Central Community HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  4. Williams v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. In Re Estate of FadoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Simmons v. GarcesIllinois Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Carrizales v. Rheem Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  3. Prevendar v. ThonnAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  4. Johannsen v. General Foods Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  5. Daleanes v. Board of Education of Benjamin Elementary School District 25Appellate Court of Illinois · 1983

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API