Legal Opinion

Wicks v. Cuneo-Henneberry Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided December 16, 1925No. 16607. Judgment affirmedPublishedCited by 84 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Thompson

The.Appellate Court for the First District has affirmed a judgment for $3000 in favor of defendant in error against plaintiff in error, and this court has allowed a petition for writ of certiorari -to review questions of law arising on the record.

The declaration charged that plaintiff in error was in control of a certain building located at the intersection of West Twenty-second street and South Grove avenue, Chicago; that it maintained in the public sidewalk in South Grove avenue two iron doors which were warped and out of repair, and that defendant in error, while in the exercise of due…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Chicago & Northwestern Railway Co. v. DunleavyIllinois Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Dewhirst v. LeopoldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Stevens v. Illinois Central RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Devine v. Federal Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Pressley v. Bloomington & Normal Railway & Light Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1916

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by84 opinions

  1. Hulke v. International Manufacturing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1957
  2. Ledingham v. Blue Cross Plan for Hospital Care of Hospital Service Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  3. Barreto v. City of WaukeganAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  4. Arthur v. CatourIllinois Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Byalos v. MathesonIllinois Supreme Court · 1927

79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API