Legal Opinion

Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. United States

United States Court of International Trade

Decided April 24, 2012No. Slip-Op. 12-53; Court 08-00410PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CARMAN, Judge:

At issue in this case is the proper tariff classification of boots imported by Plaintiff in 2006 and 2007. United States Customs and Border Protection (“Customs”) classified the boots in subheading 6404.19.35, HTSUS as “footwear of the slip-on type, that is held to the foot without the use of laces or buckles or other fasteners.” Plaintiff claims the boots should instead be classified in basket provision 6404.19.90 as other footwear valued at more than $12 per pair.

Defendant moves for summary judgment pursuant to USCIT Rule 56. For the reasons given below, the motion will…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Reiter v. Sonotone Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Jarvis Clark Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  2. Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
  3. Deckers Outdoor Corp. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API