Legal Opinion

Carole Rucker v. Mary Lattimore

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 4, 2010No. 08-56652UnpublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Petitioner-Appellant Carole Ann Ruck-er, a state prisoner, appeals the district court’s denial of her habeas corpus petition. We review the district court’s determination de novo. Schell v. Witek, 218 F.3d 1017, 1022 (9th Cir.2000). The petition is subject to the deferential standards established by the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996 (“AED-PA”). We must determine whether the state court proceedings “resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Francis v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Hoffman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. Webb v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. (HC) Hill v. ArnoldDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021
  2. Robert L. Taylor v. Stephen SmithDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2026
  3. Rucker v. LattimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API