Legal Opinion

Robert L. Taylor v. Stephen Smith

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 10, 2026No. 2:24-cv-00982Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ROBERT L. TAYLOR, Case No. 2:24-cv-0982-TLN-JDP (P) 12 Petitioner, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 STEPHEN SMITH, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner Robert L. Taylor, represented by counsel, seeks a writ of habeas corpus under 18 28 U.S.C. § 2254. ECF No. 1. He brings six claims, five arguing that he was denied his right to 19 effective counsel, and one arguing that he was denied his right to a fair trial by impartial jurors. 20

Id. at 5-6. Respondent has answered the petition, ECF No. 12, and…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Harrington v. RichterSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  4. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Brecht v. AbrahamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API