Legal Opinion
Disner v. United States of America
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 29, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2012-1302PublishedCited by 79 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, District Judge.
Pro se Plaintiffs Todd Disner and Dwight Owen Schweitzer were victims of an internet Ponzi scheme called AdSurfDaily, Inc. (ASD). Federal agents investigated ASD for wire fraud and money laundering and, pursuant to warrants, federal agents seized approximately $80 million of ASD’s funds and related assets. The Government obtained in rem forfeiture judgments against the funds and other property purchased with ASD monies. Plaintiffs allege that the warrants and the seizure of the funds were invalid and seek a declaratory judgment that their Fourth…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Rakas v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Settles v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by79 opinions
- Welsh v. HaglerDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Klayman v. ObamaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- McGreal v. AT & T Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012
- Z Street, Inc. v. KoskinenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Edwards v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.