Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Kinsman
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
KONENKAMP, Justice.
[¶ 1.] An out-of-state insurance company brought suit against South Dakota asserting that its taxing method in SDCL Chapter 10-44 unconstitutionally favors domestic insurers. According to the company, from 1970 to the present, the State imposed a higher tax on foreign insurers solely because they are nonresidents. In light of a United States Supreme Court decision prohibiting discrimination based on residence alone, the insurance company sought relief. After a trial to the circuit court, SDCL 10-44-2 and SDCL 10-44-4 through SDCL 10-44-6 were declared unconstitutional from…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Faircloth v. Raven Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- Green v. Siegel, Barnett & SchutzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Boever v. South Dakota Board of AccountancySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In Re the Estate of RicardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
- Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. KinsmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- SD Citizens for Liberty, Inc. v. Rapid City Area School District 51-4South Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
- State v. BraveheartSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2026
- Davis v. Ssd Dept. of Ed.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.