Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. Kinsman

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 26, 2008No. 24704PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] An out-of-state insurance company brought suit against South Dakota asserting that its taxing method in SDCL Chapter 10-44 unconstitutionally favors domestic insurers. According to the company, from 1970 to the present, the State imposed a higher tax on foreign insurers solely because they are nonresidents. In light of a United States Supreme Court decision prohibiting discrimination based on residence alone, the insurance company sought relief. After a trial to the circuit court, SDCL 10-44-2 and SDCL 10-44-4 through SDCL 10-44-6 were declared unconstitutional from…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Western & Southern Life Ins. Co. v. State Bd. of Equalization of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. WardSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Faircloth v. Raven Industries, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Green v. Siegel, Barnett & SchutzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Boever v. South Dakota Board of AccountancySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re the Estate of RicardSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. v. KinsmanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  3. SD Citizens for Liberty, Inc. v. Rapid City Area School District 51-4South Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  4. State v. BraveheartSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2026
  5. Davis v. Ssd Dept. of Ed.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API