Legal Opinion

Tibbs v. Moody County Board of Commissioners

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 2014No. 26897PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KONENKAMP, Justice.

[¶ 1.] The Moody County Board of Adjustment granted a conditional use permit to allow a concentrated animal feeding operation in Moody County. Shawn Tibbs, Virgil Stembaugh, and Gene and Janet Gullickson (the Citizens) petitioned the circuit court for a writ of certiorari challenging the board of adjustment’s decision to grant the conditional use permit. The Citizens also argued that the statutory scheme governing appeals to circuit courts from county-level decisions on conditional use permits violated their equal protection rights. The circuit court denied the writ and the…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  5. United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lake Hendricks Improvement Ass'n v. Brookings County Planning & Zoning CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. In Re the Estate of FlawsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Wedel v. Beadle County CommissionSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Preserve French Creek v. Custer CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Save Centennial Valley Association v. McGruderSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API