Legal Opinion

Hughes v. Sun Life Assur. Co. of Canada

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 24, 1946No. 9042PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KERNER, Circuit Judge.

Plaintiffs brought this action to declare defendants subject to the duty of recompensing plaintiffs for money paid in settlement of a claim for federal estate taxes on account of the transfer of $945,000 by Mary H. Hughes during her lifetime. The case was tried by the court. The court made special findings of fact, rendered its conclusions of law thereon, and entered a decree dismissing plaintiffs’ complaint for want of equity. To reverse the decree, plaintiffs appeal.

The pertinent and controlling facts found by the court and amply supported by the evidence are that on…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Helvering v. HallockSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. May v. HeinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  3. Riggs v. Del DragoSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Young Men's Christian Assn. of Columbus v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
  5. Bradley v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1943

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Rhiel v. Adams (In Re Adams)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2003
  2. In Re Estate of Van DuserAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  3. In Re BarnesUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001
  4. In Re the Accounting of TuttleNew York Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. In Re RileyUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API