Legal Opinion

Hemsley v. Hough

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 27, 1945No. 31656PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Emma G. Hough, hereinafter called plaintiff, commenced this action against Florence L. Hemsley et al. to cancel a rental or lease agreement made with members of the Negro race in a restricted area consisting of one block and to enjoin the violation of the restrictive agreement entered into by a majority of the lot owners and for attorney fees. Trial to the court resulted in a judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendants Florence L. Hemsley and Ernest C. Noffsinger appeal.

The record discloses that the block involved 40 lots; that the restrictive agreement was required to be signed by…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Allen v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  2. Lyons v. WallenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
  3. Hemsley v. SageSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. HubbardSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947
  2. Linder v. StappSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API