Legal Opinion
State v. Bond, Unpublished Decision (8-17-2007)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided August 17, 2007No. C-060611UnpublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION.
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant James Bond contends that he was never properly sentenced to post-release control and, therefore, that he is not subject to it. Based on the Ohio Supreme Court's decision inState v. Bezak,1 we have no choice but to sustain this appeal.
{¶ 2} In 1999, the trial court sentenced Bond to eight years' incarceration for the commission of a first-and a second-degree felony, but it failed to inform him of post-release control. To correct this error, in 2006 Bond was returned to court under R.C. 2929.191. The trial court did not conduct a new sentencing hearing. It…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. JordanOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- State ex rel. Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers v. ShewardOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. BezakOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State ex rel. Cruzado v. ZaleskiOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Woods v. TelbOhio Supreme Court · 2000
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Armstrong, 89995 (5-8-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. Bock, 07ap-119 (11-27-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. McGuireOhio Court of Appeals · 2018
- State v. White, C-060842 (11-30-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007