Legal Opinion
State v. Armstrong, 89995 (5-8-2008)
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 8, 2008No. 89995UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
JOURNAL ENTRY AND OPINION
{¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Harvey Armstrong, appeals from a judgment of the Cuyahoga County Court of Common Pleas that imposed postrelease control to his original sentence. For the following reasons, we vacate the order of postrelease control.
{¶ 2} In May 2000, the Cuyahoga County Grand Jury indicted Armstrong on 115 counts. In January 2001, Armstrong pled guilty to six counts of rape and one count of felonious assault with a three-year firearm specification. The trial court classified Armstrong as a sexual predator and sentenced him to an aggregate prison term of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. BezakOhio Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. Bruner, 2007-A-0012 (9-14-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. Bond, Unpublished Decision (8-17-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- State v. Holda, 2007ca0045 (3-17-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Parker v. Ohio Adult Parole Auth., 89693 (6-27-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. ArmstrongOhio Supreme Court · 2008