Legal Opinion

Smock v. Pierson

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1879PublishedCited by 17 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtNiblack, J.

The action in this case was by Charles C. Pierson, as executor of the last will of Ebenezer Smith, deceased, against William C. Smock and Daniel M. Ransdell, upon a promissory note, payable to the testator, for. four hundred and twenty-eight dollars and fifty-five cents.

The defendants answered that the note was given without any good or valuable consideration, to which the plaiu- ■ tiff" replied in denial.

Trial by the court at special term; finding and judgment for the plaintiff.

By a motion for a new trial, interposed at the proper time, the defendants raised the question of the sufficiency…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Glen & Hall Manufacturing Co. v. HallCommission of Appeals · 1874
  2. Baker v. RobertsIndiana Supreme Court · 1860
  3. Buckingham v. WatersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Wolford v. PowersIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  2. Neidefer v. ChastainIndiana Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Wilson v. Town of MonticelloIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Chicago & Atlantic Railway Co. v. DerkesIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Vigo Agricultural Society v. BrumfielIndiana Supreme Court · 1885

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API