Buckingham v. Waters
California Supreme Court
Appeal from the Twelfth District.
1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, J.
1. The plaintiff sues the defendant to recover some two thousand dollars, on this state of facts: the complaint, which is not artificially drawn, sets out that the plaintiff bought of the defendant certain horses, etc. on the-day of ¡November, 1857, and, on the same day, (but not averred to be part of the same contract,) “ that plaintiff bought of the defendant the good will of a certain mercantile house, (describing it,) in the matter of drayage,” for two thousand dollars; that defendant executed to plaintiff a certain instrument in writing. This instrument recites, among other things, that…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Smock v. PiersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
- Leeke v. HancockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Clay v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- H. B. Claflin Co. v. SimonUtah Supreme Court · 1898