Legal Opinion

Matter of Youmans

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 18, 1990PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

This attorney-disciplinary proceeding arises out of two presentments filed by the District VII Ethics Committee (Ethics Committee) concerning six separate complaints lodged against respondent, Louis B. Youmans. Following a determination by the Ethics Committee, the Disciplinary Review Board (DRB or Board) concluded that respondent had engaged in unethical conduct. The Board unanimously recommended that respondent’s license to practice law be suspended for a period of two years.

Pending final resolution of the matter, the Office of Attorney Ethics petitioned this Court for an order seeking…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. In Re WilsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
  2. Matter of NoonanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1986
  3. In Re GavelSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  4. In Re CarlsenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
  5. Matter of SchwartzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. ArtimezWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Office of Disciplinary Counsel v. BattistelliWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1995
  3. In Re KivlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
  4. In re YoumansAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. In Re PenaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API