Legal Opinion
Knoedler v. Roxbury Township
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided March 5, 1980No. Civ. 80-228PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SAROKIN, District Judge.
Plaintiff seeks declaratory and injunctive relief from the enforcement of Roxbury Township Ordinance 23 — 79, which prohibits the sale and offering for sale of drug paraphernalia. Jurisdiction is based upon 42 U.S.C. § 1983, 28 U.S.C. § 2201 and § 2202.
The plaintiff instituted the action by filing a verified complaint with an application for an order to show cause and temporary restraints. On January 29, 1980, the Court considered and granted the application for a temporary restraining order and two days later, delivered an oral opinion granting the requested…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Virginia State Board of Pharmacy v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
- County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Town Tobacconist v. KimmelmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- State v. NewmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
- Record Revolution No. 6, Inc. v. City of ParmaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- High Ol' Times, Inc. v. George Busbee, Governor of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Casbah, Inc. v. ThoneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.