Legal Opinion

Caffey v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Company

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 6, 1956No. 7419PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUARK, Judge.

Plaintiff had verdict and judgment because of damage to his pickup truck sus-táined in a diesel engine-truck collision. After the overruling of proper motions defendant has appealed. Plaintiff pleaded and submitted failure to give the statutory signals by bell or whistle. Defendant pleaded and submitted denial of its negligence and contributory negligence on the part of plaintiff.

The collision'occurred in the daytime on a clear and cold December day near the west side of Lebanon where defendánt’s east-west 'tracks cross over the old Springfield road, which at that point is a…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Hooper Ex Rel. Hooper v. ConradSupreme Court of Missouri · 1953
  2. Kelsay v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  3. Long v. MildSupreme Court of Missouri · 1941
  4. Branscum v. GlaserSupreme Court of Missouri · 1950
  5. Gratiot v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1893

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Graeff Ex Rel. Graeff v. Baptist Temple of SpringfieldSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Lafferty v. WattleMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961
  3. Johnson v. BushMissouri Court of Appeals · 1967
  4. Harrellson v. BarksMissouri Court of Appeals · 1959
  5. Wood v. EzellMissouri Court of Appeals · 1961

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API