Jennings v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
1DissentHolmes, Circuit Judge
The majority opinion holds that petitioners are entitled to offset personal losses from gambling operations against their distributive shares of partnership gains from similar operations. To concur in this ruling, it is necessary to conclude that, while Congress provided for the separate computation of partnership income, it intended that the total so reached' would be discarded and the individual items of gain or loss would then be separated and each brought forward into the returns of the respective partners, and there combined with individual income and deductions to arrive at the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Botany Worsted Mills v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Mintz v. Tri-County Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Johnston v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Klingenstein v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937
- Boehm v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1885