Legal Opinion

Klingenstein v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 26, 1937No. 43165PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LITTLETON, Judge.

The question presented is whether plaintiff was entitled to offset his individual losses amounting to $32,144.95, which arose from the sale of securities held by him for less than two years, against his share of the net income of the partnership), of Wertheim & Co., of which he was a. member, when the net profits of the partnership resulted from the sale of securities which the partnership had held for less than two years. We are of opinion, that the plaintiff was not entitled to the deductions claimed.

In Archbald v. Commissioner, 27 B.T.A. 837, the government advanced the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Johnston v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  2. Archbald v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1933
  3. Johnston v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1936
  4. Klauber v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1936

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Craik v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
  2. Lamont v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1944
  3. Mosbacher v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940
  4. Cohn v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1938
  5. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API