McClerkin v. Sutton

Suit by appellant upon a promissory note executed by appellee, which recited that said Sutton had delivered to McClerkin a deed of conveyance for certain land, for the price of which the note was given. Answer in two paragraphs. The first avers that the note was given to appellee in payment for certain lands purchased by appellant, to which the appellee falsely and fraudulently repre*408sented that he had a good title, wherefore the consideration of the note had failed.

A. C. Donald, for appellant. O. M. Welbom, for appellee.

The appellant informs us that it does not appear, by this paragraph,…